Rafael Nadal has again won the final against Novak Djokovic, this time in Rome. Nadal already won in Monte Carlo against Djokovic and is of course the current #1 player in the world.
But I don’t like to see him there. It’s not that he doesn’t deserve his #1 spot.
He does, but not because he beats his opponents with better tennis, but because his opponents beat themselves.
I would like to see the best player in the world to be a better player than his opponents.
He should be able to attack and exploit all types of weakness and be able to win points in a variety of ways. Roger Federer is the perfect example of what a #1 player in the world should play like.
Roger Federer is able to play any tactic he wants and he can play any shot he wants – and of course he is a master of all of them.
But Rafael Nadal plays different tennis.
The tie-break of the first set in the Rome 2009 final is a great example how Nadal plays and how he wins. I’ll break it down shot by shot so that you can see what goes on… (more…)